Chavis v. Dunn (INMATE 3)

Filing 6

JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that: (1) Petitioner's objections (doc. no. 3 -1) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's 2 Recommendation is adopted. (3) The 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas C orpus is denied without prejudice because the required permission has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of CivilProcedure. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/28/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ELMER CHAVIS, (AIS # 00245609), ) ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) JEFFERSON DUNN, ) Commissioner, Alabama ) Department of Corrections, ) ) Respondent. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15cv496-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that: (1) Petitioner's objections (doc. no. 3-1) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 2) is adopted. (3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. no. 1) is denied without prejudice because the required permission has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 28th day of August, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson_____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?