Martin v. Dotson et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 78

ORDER as follows: 1. The 72 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff's 68 Motion to Dismiss Defendants Olson, Bruhn, and Buggs is GRANTED pursuant to FRCP 41(a); 3. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Olson, Bru hn, and Buggs are DISMISSED without prejudice; 4. There being no other claims pending against them, Defendants Olson, Bruhn, and Buggs are DISMISSED from this case; and 5. This case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 11/9/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DANIEL JESUS MARTIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
OFFICER MIKE (CPL) DOTSON, et
al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
) CASE NO. 1:16-CV-58-WKW
) (WO)
)
)
)
)

DANIEL JESUS MARTIN, # 278226, )
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
) CASE NO. 1:16-CV-245-WKW
) (WO)
LT. MICHAEL BRYAN,
)
)
Defendant.
)
DANIEL JESUS MARTIN, # 278226, )
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
) CASE NO. 1:16-CV-334WKW
) (WO)
OFFICER MIKE (CPL) DOTSON, et )
al.,
)
)
Defendant.
)

ORDER
On October 12, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #
72) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the
record and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it
is ORDERED as follows:
1.

The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 72) is ADOPTED;

2.

Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss Defendants Olson, Bruhn, and Buggs is

GRANTED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a);
3.

Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Olson, Bruhn, and Buggs are

DISMISSED without prejudice;
4.

There being no other claims pending against them, Defendants Olson,

Bruhn, and Buggs are DISMISSED from this case; and
5.

This case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further

proceedings.
DONE this 9th day of November, 2016.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2