Shultz v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)

Filing 172

JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Dfts' 159 & 166 objections are overruled; (2) The US Magistrate Judge's 158 & 164 recommendations are adopted; (3) The administrator's decision den ying plf long-term disability benefits is reversed, and this matter is remanded to the plan administrator to complete the record and obtain a new decision on plf's claims for benefits, consistent with the reasoning of the magistrate judge's recommendations; (4) All issues regarding ancillary benefits are deferred for consideration until after a proper decision is reached as to plf's long-term disability claim, based upon an administrative decision reached with the benefit of prope r administrative proceedings and a full and complete record; (5) All pending motions are denied as moot; (6) The court retains jurisdiction over this case with regard to the plan administrator's decision on remand and all other claims and matter s not resolved at this time; (7) This case is administratively closed pending completion of the administrative proceedings; The parties are to notify the court of the need to reopen the proceedings within 30 days of receipt of notice of the conclusion of the administrative process. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/22/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (alm, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION RICHARD P. SHULTZ, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; and L-3 COMMUNICATIONS WELFARE PLAN, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16cv94-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendants’ objections (doc. nos. 159 & 166) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendations (doc. nos. 158 & 164) are adopted. (3) The administrator’s decision denying plaintiff long-term matter complete disability is remanded the record benefits is to plan and the obtain reversed, a and this administrator to new on decision plaintiff’s claims for benefits, consistent with the reasoning of the magistrate judge’s recommendations. (4) All issues deferred for decision is regarding consideration reached as ancillary until to benefits after a plaintiff’s are proper long-term disability claim, based upon an administrative decision reached with the benefit of proper administrative proceedings and a full and complete record. (5) All pending motions are denied as moot. (6) The court retains jurisdiction over this case with regard to the plan administrator’s decision on remand and all other claims and matters not resolved at this time. (7) This case is administratively closed pending completion of the administrative proceedings. The parties are to notify the court of the need to reopen the proceedings within 30 days of receipt of notice of the conclusion of the administrative process. DONE, this the 22nd day of November, 2017. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?