Shultz v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)
Filing
172
JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Dfts' 159 & 166 objections are overruled; (2) The US Magistrate Judge's 158 & 164 recommendations are adopted; (3) The administrator's decision den ying plf long-term disability benefits is reversed, and this matter is remanded to the plan administrator to complete the record and obtain a new decision on plf's claims for benefits, consistent with the reasoning of the magistrate judge's recommendations; (4) All issues regarding ancillary benefits are deferred for consideration until after a proper decision is reached as to plf's long-term disability claim, based upon an administrative decision reached with the benefit of prope r administrative proceedings and a full and complete record; (5) All pending motions are denied as moot; (6) The court retains jurisdiction over this case with regard to the plan administrator's decision on remand and all other claims and matter s not resolved at this time; (7) This case is administratively closed pending completion of the administrative proceedings; The parties are to notify the court of the need to reopen the proceedings within 30 days of receipt of notice of the conclusion of the administrative process. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/22/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (alm, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
RICHARD P. SHULTZ,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY; and L-3
COMMUNICATIONS WELFARE
PLAN,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
1:16cv94-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) Defendants’ objections (doc. nos. 159 & 166)
are overruled.
(2) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendations (doc. nos. 158 & 164) are adopted.
(3) The administrator’s decision denying plaintiff
long-term
matter
complete
disability
is
remanded
the
record
benefits
is
to
plan
and
the
obtain
reversed,
a
and
this
administrator
to
new
on
decision
plaintiff’s claims for benefits, consistent with the
reasoning of the magistrate judge’s recommendations.
(4) All
issues
deferred
for
decision
is
regarding
consideration
reached
as
ancillary
until
to
benefits
after
a
plaintiff’s
are
proper
long-term
disability claim, based upon an administrative decision
reached
with
the
benefit
of
proper
administrative
proceedings and a full and complete record.
(5) All pending motions are denied as moot.
(6) The court retains jurisdiction over this case
with
regard
to
the
plan
administrator’s
decision
on
remand and all other claims and matters not resolved at
this time.
(7) This case is administratively closed pending
completion
of
the
administrative
proceedings.
The
parties are to notify the court of the need to reopen
the proceedings within 30 days of receipt of notice of
the conclusion of the administrative process.
DONE, this the 22nd day of November, 2017.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?