Reynolds v. Dept/Transportation, et al

Filing 8481

JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) the Adams intervenors' objections 8392 and 8434 are overruled; (2) the plfs' objections 8393 are overruled; (3) the special master's REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 8378 is adopted; (4) the defs' motion to recover contempt fines 8179 is denied without prejudice; (5) the Adams intervenors' motion for entry of further orders regarding disposition of co ntempt fines 8361 is denied without prejudice; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 8/18/09. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION JOHNNY REYNOLDS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:85cv665-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The Adams intervenors' objections (Doc. Nos. 8392 & 8434) are overruled. (2) The plaintiffs' objections (Doc. No. 8393) are overruled. (3) The special master's recommendation (Doc. No. 8378) is adopted. (4) The defendants' motion to recover contempt fines (Doc. No. 8179) is denied without prejudice. (5) The Adams intervenors' motion for entry of further orders regarding disposition of contempt fines (Doc. No. 8361) is denied without prejudice. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 18th day of August, 2009. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?