Reynolds v. Dept/Transportation, et al

Filing 8821

JUDGMENT, in accordance with the Memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) the Special Master's 8801 Report and Recommendation is adopted; (2) the defendants' 8655 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted on the individual-contempt claims of claimant Gary Smith; (3) judgment is entered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiffs as to claimant Smith's individual-contempt claims, with the plaintiffs and claim ant Smith taking nothing as to claimant Smith's claims; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/3/12. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION JOHNNY REYNOLDS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:85cv665-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The special master’s recommendation (Doc. No. 8801) is adopted. (2) The defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 8655) is granted on the individualcontempt claims of claimant Gary Smith. (3) Judgment is entered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiffs as to claimant Smith’s individual-contempt claims, with the plaintiffs and claimant Smith taking nothing as to claimant Smith’s claims. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 3rd day of April, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?