Reynolds v. Dept/Transportation, et al

Filing 9020

JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) claimant Christopher Azubuike's 9001 Objections are overruled;; (2) the Special master's 8989 Rep ort and Recommendation regarding claimant Azubuike's individual-contempt claim against defendants is adopted; (3) the defendants' 8963 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; (4) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against cl aimant Azubuike, with claimant Azubuike taking nothing by his individual-contempt claim; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/2/13. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

JOHNNY REYNOLDS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:85cv665-MHT
(WO)

JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1)

Claimant

Christopher

Azubuike’s’s

objections

(Doc. No. 9001) are overruled.
(2) The special master’s recommendation regarding
claimant

Azubuike’s

individual-contempt

claim

against

defendants (Doc. No. 8989) is adopted.
(3) The defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc.
No. 8963) is granted.

(4) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and
against claimant Azubuike, with claimant Azubuike taking
nothing by his individual-contempt claim.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
DONE, this the 2nd day of December, 2013.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE