Cox v. Allen et al (INMATE1) DO NOT ACCEPT DISCOVERY REQUESTS UNLESS HAVE LEAVE OF COURT

Filing 41

ORDER that: 1) ADOPTING 40 Report and Recommendations; 2) Defendants have filed special reports (docs. 10 , 18 , 20 ), in response to plaintiff's suit under 42 USC 1983, which reports the court construes as motions for summary judgment; See order (doc. 22 ) of 1/16/07; Defendants' motions for summary judgment (docs. 10 , 18 , 20 ) are granted for the reasons stated in the mag judge's recommendation. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 5/8/09. (Attachments: # 1 appeals checklist)(vma, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DERRICK COX, #140603, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD ALLEN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE NO.: 2:06-cv-989-MHT (WO)

ORDER The magistrate judge entered a recommendation (Doc. #40) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the recommendation and after an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the court believes that the recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: (1) (2) The recommendation (Doc. #40) of the magistrate judge is adopted. Defendants have filed special reports (Docs. ##10, 18, 20), in response to

plaintiff's suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which reports the court construes as motions for summary judgment. See order (Doc. #22) of January 16, 2007. Defendants' motions for summary judgment (Docs. ##10, 18, 20) are granted for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's recommendation. An appropriate judgment will be entered. DONE, this the 8th day of May, 2009. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE