Taylor v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
JUDGMENT, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The US Magistrate Judge's 23 Recommendation is adopted; (2) The 28 USC 2255 petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 4/27/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
BRIDGET V. TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07cv404-MHT (WO)
JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's
recommendation (Doc. No. 23) is adopted. (2) The 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 27th day of April, 2009.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?