Mann v. Darden et al

Filing 145

JUDGMENT directing that it is therefore the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that judgment is entered in favor of defendant James A. Darden and against plaintiff Sue-Zanne Mann, with plaintiff Mann taking nothing by her complaint; further ORD ERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Mann, for which execution may issue; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/23/11. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION SUE-ZANNE MANN, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. JAMES A. DARDEN, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07cv751-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT On the 23rd day of August 2011, after this cause had been presented to a jury, a verdict was returned as follows: I. Tasing Incident (1) Stage One: Do you find that defendant James A. Darden is entitled to prevail at stage one? Yes X No _____ If you find that Darden prevails at stage one, you need not go any further. If you find that he does not prevail at stage one, then you should continue to stage two. XXX It is therefore the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that judgment is entered in favor of defendant James A. Darden and against plaintiff Sue-Zanne Mann, with plaintiff Mann taking nothing by her complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Mann, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 23rd day of August, 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?