McCray v. Astrue
OPINION. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 1/30/09. (Attachments: # 1 appeals checklist)(vma, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
BRENDA McCRAY for B.M., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) OPINION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv209-MHT (WO)
This Social Security case is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendant Commissioner of Social Security's decision should be affirmed. Also before the court are
plaintiff's objections to the recommendation.
independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that plaintiff's objections should be overruled and the magistrate judge's recommendation adopted. Even
if Ellington v. Astrue, 2008 WL 1805435 (M.D. Ala. 2008)
Coody, M.J.), were to apply, it is apparent that the ALJ sufficiently separated the three inquiries demanded under Ellington . An appropriate judgment will be entered. DONE, this the 30th day of January, 2009.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?