McCray v. Astrue
JUDGMENT it is the Order, Judge, and Decree of the court as follows: 1) Plaintiff's objections (doc. no. 22 ) are overruled; 2) The US Mag Judge's recommendation doc. 21 is adopted; 3) The decision of dft Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed; It is further Ordered that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue; The clerk of the court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 1/30/09. (Attachments: # 1 appeals checklist)(vma, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
BRENDA McCRAY for B.M., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv209-MHT (WO)
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's objections (Doc. No. 22) are
recommendation (Doc. No. 21) is adopted. (3) The decision of defendant Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 30th day of January, 2009.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?