Jones v. Forniss et al (INMATE2)
Filing
59
JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the 58 Opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff Boykin Jones's 57 objections are overruled; (2) The United States Magistrate Judge 9;s 56 recommendation is adopted; (3) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Nikkita Shambray and against plaintiff Jones, with plaintiff Jones taking nothing by his complaint; it is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Jones, for which execution may issue; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 3/7/11. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
Jones v. Forniss et al (INMATE2)
Doc. 59
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
BOYKIN JONES, Plaintiff, v. NIKKITA SHAMBRAY, Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv220-MHT (WO)
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff Boykin Jones's objections (doc. no. 57) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's
recommendation (doc. no. 56) is adopted. (3) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant
Nikkita Shambray and against plaintiff Jones, with plaintiff Jones taking nothing by his
complaint.
Dockets.Justia.com
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Jones, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 7th day of March, 2011.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?