Lloyd v. Marshall et al (INMATE1)

Filing 91

ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the 90 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1.) The 90 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2.) The defendants' motions for summary judgment are GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 4/19/12. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
DERRICK M. LLOYD,
Plaintiff,
v.
DAVID T. MARSHALL, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:08-cv-419-MEF

ORDER
On March 21, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #90) in this
case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file
in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. The defendants' motions for summary judgment are GRANTED and this case is
DISMISSED with prejudice.
th

DONE this the 19 day of April, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE