Esco v. Steel et al (INMATE2)

Filing 23

ORDER overruling plaintiff's 19 objection; adopting 18 Report and Recommendations; dismissing plaintiff's claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections and Commissioner Allen with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii); dismissing Alabama Department of Corrections and Commissioner Allen as parties to this complaint; that this case with respect to the remaining defendant is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 3/5/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF N O R T H E R N DIVISION B IL L Y DWIGHT ESCO, #243253, P l a i n t if f , v. L T . STEEL, et al., D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C A S E NO. 2:08-cv-763-TMH WO ORDER A f te r an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE o f the court that: 1 . The plaintiff's objection (Doc. #19) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate J u d g e filed on February 12, 2009 is overruled; 2 . The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #18) filed on February 4, 2 0 0 9 is adopted; 3. Plaintiff's claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections and C o m m iss io n e r Allen are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to th e provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i and (ii). 4. The Alabama Department of Corrections and Commissioner Allen are D IS M IS S E D as parties to this complaint. 5 . This case with respect to the remaining defendant is referred back to the Magistrate J u d g e for additional proceedings. D O N E this 5th day of March, 2009. /s / Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS S E N IO R UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?