Ellis v. Sadeek (INMATE1)

Filing 14

FINAL JUDGMENT that: (2) the 6 motion to dismiss filed by defendant Sadeek be granted to the extent the defendant seeks dismissal of this case due to the plaintiff's failure to exhaust the administrative remedy currently available to him at th e Bullock Correctional Facility; (2) the claims against defendant Sadeek be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 42 USC 1997e(a) for the plaintiff's failure to exhaust the administrative remedy presently available to him at the Bullock Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 2/4/09. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(sl, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WILLIAM LANIER ELLIS, SR., #259380, Plaintiff, v. DR. SADEEK, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08-CV-790-SRW [WO] FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered herewith, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT AND DECREE of this court that: 1. The motion to dismiss filed by defendant Sadeek be GRANTED to the extent the defendant seeks dismissal of this case due to the plaintiff's failure to exhaust the administrative remedy currently available to him at the Bullock Correctional Facility. 2. The claims against defendant Sadeek be DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. 1997e(a) for the plaintiff's failure to exhaust the administrative remedy presently available to him at the Bullock Correctional Facility. Done, this 4th day of February, 2009. /s/ Susan Russ Walker SUSAN RUSS WALKER CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?