Vaughn et al v. Synovus Financial Corporation et al

Filing 88

JUDGMENT as follows: (1) plaintiff Richard Vales's 83 and 86 motions to dismiss are granted; (2) all of plaintiff Vales's claims against defendants Michael Carter, Synovous Financial Corporation, and First Commercial Holdings Corporatio n d/b/a as First Commercial Bank, are dismissed with prejudice, pro tanto, costs taxed as paid; (3) because there is no just reason for delay, this is a final judgment of dismissal pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the FRCP; (4) this litigation is terminated as to plaintiff Vales. The Clerk of court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 8/31/09. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(sl, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION PERCY J. VAUGHN, JR.; et al., Plaintiffs, v. SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION; et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv140-MHT (WO) It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff Richard Vales's motions to dismiss (Doc. Nos. 83 & 86) are granted. (2) All of plaintiff Vales's claims against defendants Michael Carter, Synovous Financial Corporation, and First Commercial Holdings Corporation d/b/a as First Commercial Bank, are dismissed with prejudice, pro tanto, costs taxed as paid. (3) Because there is no just reason for delay, this is a final judgment of dismissal pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (4) This litigation is terminated as to plaintiff Vales. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 31st day of August, 2009. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?