Austin v. City of Montgomery et al (MAG+)

Filing 12

ORDERED that: (1) The 11 Objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is overruled; (2) The 10 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) The plaintiff's challenge to the outcome of the Montgomery County Circuit Court civil proceeding is DISMISSED with prejudice; (4) The plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice; and (5) This case is DISMISSED pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1) and 12(h)(3). Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 4/17/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cb, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF N O R T H E R N DIVISION A L O N Z O AUSTIN, P la in tif f , v. C IT Y OF MONTGOMERY, et al., D e f e n d a n ts. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C A S E NO. 2:09-cv-188-MEF WO ORDER A f te r an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE o f the court that: 1 . The plaintiff's objection (Doc. #11) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate J u d g e filed on April 15, 2009 is overruled; 2 . The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #10) filed on April 2, 2009 is adopted; 3 . The plaintiff's challenge to the outcome of the Montgomery County Circuit Court c iv il proceeding is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4 . The plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. 5 . This case is DISMISSED pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(h)(3). D O N E this the 17th day of April, 2009. /s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?