Rogers v. City of Montgomery et al
ORDER directing as follows: (1) The 27 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) Dfts' 22 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution is DENIED; (3) Dfts' 34 Motion to Withdraw its motion to dismiss or compel discovery is D ENIED as MOOT; and (4) This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for all pretrial proceedings and entry of any other orders or recommendations as may be appropriate. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 4/2/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION JA U R E L ROGERS, P la i n t i f f , v. C IT Y OF MONTGOMERY, et al., D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER O n March 10, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case (Doc. # 27), to which no objections were filed. Upon independent review of the record, and upon consideratio n of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows: (1 ) (2) (3 ) T h e Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 27) is ADOPTED; D efen d ants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution (Doc. # 22) is DENIED; Defendants' motion to withdraw its motion to dismiss or compel discovery (D o c. # 34) is DENIED as MOOT; and (4 ) T h is case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for all pretrial p ro ceedings and entry of any other orders or recommendations as may be a p p ro p ria te . DONE this 2nd day of April, 2010.
C A S E NO. 2:09-CV-288-WKW
/s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?