Richardson v. Price et al (INMATE1)
Filing
31
ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the 30 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, that the petition for habeas corpus relief be and is hereby DENIED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 5/2/12. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
RONNIE RICHARDSON, #142585,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Petitioner,
v.
CHERYL PRICE, et al.,
Respondents.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv309-TMH
(WO)
OPINION
On April 4, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case
recommending that the petition of habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be
dismissed in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). (Doc. # 30).Upon
an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation
of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be
and is hereby ADOPTED, that the petition for habeas corpus relief be and is hereby
DENIED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with
the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1).
Done this 2nd day of May 2012.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?