Johnson v. Brooks et al (INMATE1)
ORDER that 1) ADOPTING 4 Report and Recommendations, 2) the plaintiff's claims against defendant Brooks and Myrick be dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the directive of 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); and 3) To the extent Johnson presents a claim challenging the constitutionality of actions occuring in a pending state criminal case, this case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 6/17/09. (Attachments: # 1 appeals checklist)(vma, )
THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION A L V IN JAMES JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
2:09-CV-385-TMH [W O ]
D IS T R IC T ATTORNEY ELLEN BROOKS a n d DETECTIVE MIKE MYRICK, et al., Defendants.
O n May 5, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. 4) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this c a se and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is O R D E R E D that: 1. 2. T h e Recommendation (Doc. 4) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; T h e plaintiff's claims against defendant Brooks and Myrick be DISMISSED w ith prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1 9 1 5 (e )(2 )(B )(i) and (iii); and 3. T o the extent Johnson presents a claim challenging the constitutionality of a c t i o n s occurring in a pending state criminal case, this case be DISMISSED w ith o u t prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
A n appropriate judgment will be entered. D o n e this 17th day of June, 2009.
/s / Truman M. Hobbs S E N IO R UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?