Smith v. Wheeler-White et al (INMATE3)
ORDER ADOPTING 2 Report and Recommendations, with the exception of that part of footnote 1 which pointed out that the Petitioner did not file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and this case is transferred to the USDC for the NDAL, pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 2241(d). Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 6/16/09. (Attachments: # 1 appeals checklist)(vma, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ELEANOR SMITH, #217730, Petitioner, vs. CYNTHIA S. WHEELER-WHITE, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv425-WHA (WO)
ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #2), filed on May 29, 2009. No timely objection has been filed by the Petitioner, although the court notes that the Petitioner filed an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit (Doc. #3) on June 5, 2009. No objection having been filed, and the court finding the Recommendation to be well taken, it is hereby ORDERED that the court adopts the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, with the exception of that part of footnote 1 which pointed out that the Petitioner did not file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). DONE this 16th day June, 2009.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?