Gutierrez v. Buford et al (INMATE1)

Filing 37

ORDER directing that, after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the 36 Recommendation should be adopted; accordingly, it is ORDERED that (1.) The 36 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2.) The petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED; and (3.) The petition is dismissed without prejudice to afford Petitioner an opportunity to exhaust all available state court remedies; a separate judgment shall issue. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 2/1/12. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ISRAEL GUTIERREZ, #246141, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. TOMMY BUFORD, et al., Respondents. CASE NO. 2:09-CV-429-WHA ORDER The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #36) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that 1. The Recommendation (Doc. #36) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. The petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED; and 3. The petition is dismissed without prejudice to afford Petitioner an opportunity to exhaust all available state court remedies. A separate judgment shall issue. Done this 1st day of February, 2012. /s/ W. Harold Albritton UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?