Malloy v. Wise et al (INMATE 1)
ORDERED as follows: (1) The 10 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, APPROVED, and AFFIRMED; and (2) The 28 U.S. C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED and DISMISSED in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A) as further set out. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 8/13/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cb, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION A R T H U R BRENNAN MALLOY A IS #101329, P l a i n t if f , , v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER B efo re the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and Plaintiff's O b j e c tio n s . (Doc. Nos. 10 and 12.) Having conducted a de novo determination of those p o rtio n s of the Recommendation to which objections are made, it is CONSIDERED and O R D E R E D as follows: 1. T h e Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and the same is hereby A D O P T E D , APPROVED and AFFIRMED. 3. T h e 28 U.S. C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief filed by Arthur B re n n a n Malloy on May 15, 2009, be and same is hereby DENIED and D IS M IS SE D in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), a s Malloy has failed to obtain the requisite order from the Eleventh Circuit C o u rt of Appeals authorizing this court to consider his successive habeas a p p l ic a t io n .
C ivil Action No. 2:09cv0467-ID
D AV ID WISE, et al., D e f e n d a n ts .
DONE this 13 th of August, 2009.
/s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?