Noe v. Alabama Dept. of Corrections (INMATE 1)
ORDER as follows: 1. 5 Objections are OVERRULED. 2. The 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate is ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED. 3. That this action be and the same is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, due to Plaintiff's failure to pay the full filing fee upon the initiation of this case. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 7/16/2009. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn)
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION WOODBURCK NOE, #148475, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Civil Action No. 2:09cv511-ID
ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant.
ORDER B e fo re the court are Plaintiff Woodburck Noe's Objections and the Recommendation o f the Magistrate Judge (Docs. No. 4 and 5). Having conducted a de novo determination
o f those portions of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge to which objection is m a d e , it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED as follows: 1. 2. T h a t said objections be and the same are hereby OVERRULED. T h e Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and the same is hereby A D O P T E D , APPROVED and AFFIRMED. 3. T h a t this action be and the same is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, d u e to Plaintiff's failure to pay the full filing fee upon the initiation of this ca se. Done this 16 th day of July, 2009.
/s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?