Jones v. Allen et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 68

ORDER and OPINION that: (1) The plaintiff's motion to dismiss is GRANTED; (2) The plaintiff's claims against Anthony Jackson, Sandra Cooper, Tasha Johnson, Lloyd Hicks, Michael McCraney and Jerome Burney are DISMISSED with prejudice; (3) An thony Jackson, Sandra Cooper, Tasha Johnson, Lloyd Hicks, Michael McCraney and Jerome Burney are DISMISSED as parties to this cause of action; and (4) This case, with respect to the plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants, is referred back to the undersigned for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 9/28/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeal Checklist)(cb, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION SY L V E ST E R JONES, #196149, P l a i n t if f , v. R IC H AR D ALLEN, et al., D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C IV IL ACTION NO. 2:09cv597-ID O R D E R AND OPINION O n September 8, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to w h ic h no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 64). Upon an independent review of th e file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be a n d is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. 2. T h e plaintiff's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. T h e plaintiff's claims against Anthony Jackson, Sandra Cooper, Tasha Jo h n so n , Lloyd Hicks, Michael McCraney and Jerome Burney are D ISM ISSE D with prejudice. 3. A n th o n y Jackson, Sandra Cooper, Tasha Johnson, Lloyd Hicks, Michael M c C ra n e y and Jerome Burney are DISMISSED as parties to this cause of a c ti o n . 4. T h is case, with respect to the plaintiff's claims against the remaining d efe n d an ts, is referred back to the undersigned for additional proceedings. Done this the 28 th day of September, 2009. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?