Stewart v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
ORDER AND OPINION, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 7 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1) The plf's claims against the AL Dept. of Corrections are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(I); 2) The AL Dept. of Corrections is DISMISSED as a dft in this cause of action; 3) This case, with respect to the allegations set forth against the remaining dfts, is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 9/15/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION R O B E R T FRANKLIN STEWART, #197704 P l a i n t if f , v. AL A B AM A DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al., D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09CV684-ID
O R D E R AND OPINION O n August 26, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to w h ic h no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 7). Upon an independent review of th e file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be a n d is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. T h e plaintiff's claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections are D IS M IS S E D with prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1 9 1 5 ( e ) ( 2 ) ( B ) ( I) . 2. T h e Alabama Department of Corrections is DISMISSED as a defendant in this c a u se of action.
T h is case, with respect to the allegations set forth against the remaining d e fe n d a n ts, is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate p roc ee d ings.
Done this the 15 th day of September, 2009.
/s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?