Lewis v. Randle et al

Filing 27

JUDGMENT that (1) Plaintiff's 25 objections are overruled; (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's 22 recommendation is adopted; (3) Defendants' 15 motion to dismiss is granted; (4) This lawsuit is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 4/23/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(br, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

BENNIE FRANK LEWIS, Plaintiff, v. RICARDO RANDLE, et al., Defendants.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv809-MHT (WO)

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's objections (Doc. No. 25) are

recommendation (Doc. No. 22) is adopted. (3) Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 15) is granted. (4) This lawsuit is dismissed for lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 23rd day of April, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE