Guarantee Company of North America USA v. W.D. Wainwright & Sons, Inc. et al

Filing 161

PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT; The Court, with the consent of Plaintiff The Guarantee Company of North America USA ("GCNA") and Defendants Stephen R. Wainwright and Sheryl B. Wainwright (collectively hereinafter, the "Parties"), hereby O RDERS final judgment in favor of GCNA and against Defendants Stephen R. Wainwright and Sheryl B. Wainwright, separately and severally, in the amount of FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND and no/100 Dollars ($500,000.00). The Court has jurisdiction over the s ubject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. This Court also has personal jurisdiction over the Parties. Solely for the purposes of this Consent Judgment and the underlying complaint, the Parties waive all objections and defenses t hat they may have to jurisdiction of the Court or to venue in this District. The Parties shall not challenge the Court's jurisdiction to enter and enforce this Consent Decree. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 6/20/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(jg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
GUARANTEE COMPANY OF NORTH
AMERICA USA,
Plaintiff,
v.
SHERYL B. WAINWRIGHT, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:09-cv-1003-MEF

(WO)

PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT
Having found that there is no just reason for delay, and pursuant to Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 54(b), the Court enters the following partial final judgment:
The Court, with the consent of Plaintiff The Guarantee Company of North
America USA (“GCNA”) and Defendants Stephen R. Wainwright and Sheryl B.
Wainwright (collectively hereinafter, the “Parties”), hereby ORDERS final judgment in
favor of GCNA and against Defendants Stephen R. Wainwright and Sheryl B.
Wainwright, separately and severally, in the amount of FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND
and no/100 Dollars ($500,000.00).
The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1332. This Court also has personal jurisdiction over the Parties. Solely for the
purposes of this Consent Judgment and the underlying complaint, the Parties waive all
objections and defenses that they may have to jurisdiction of the Court or to venue in this

District. The Parties shall not challenge the Court’s jurisdiction to enter and enforce this
Consent Decree.
Done this the 20 th day of June, 2011.

/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2