Reeder v. Allen et al (INMATE3)
FINAL JUDGMENT, in accordance with the prior proceedings and orders of the court, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment be and the same is hereby entered in favor of respondents and against petitioner and that petitioner take nothing b y his said suit; further CONSIDERED and ORDERING that all costs herein incurred be and the same are hereby TAXED against petitioner, for which let execution issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 4/30/10. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION M IC H A E L SCOTT REEDER, #232101 P e titio n e r, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C iv il Action No. 2:09-cv-1035-ID (W O )
R IC H A R D ALLEN, et al., R e sp o n d e n ts .
F I N A L JUDGMENT
In accordance with the prior proceedings and orders of the court, it is C O N S ID E R E D , ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment be and the same is hereby e n te re d in favor of Respondents, and against Petitioner Michael Scott Reeder and that P e titio n e r take nothing by his said suit. It is further CONSIDERED and ORDERED that all costs herein incurred be and th e same are hereby TAXED against Petitioner, for which let execution issue. The clerk of the court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a fin a l judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. D O N E this the 30th day of April, 2010.
/s / Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?