Jerido v. Reeves et al (INMATE1)
ORDER directing that: 1) The plf's 65 Motion to Dismiss is hereby GRANTED; 2) The plf's claims against Earl Reeves are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; 3) Earl Reeves is DISMISSED as a party to this cause of action; 4) This case, with respect to the plf's claims against the remaining dfts, is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 4/2/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ANTONIO ORLANDER JERIDO, AIS #169480, Plaintiff, v. EARL REEVES, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-CV-1088-ID
ORDER On March 15, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. No. 67) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon CONSIDERATION of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, said Recommendation is hereby adopted and it is ORDERED that: 1. 2. 3. 4. The plaintiff's motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED. The plaintiff's claims against Earl Reeves are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Earl Reeves is DISMISSED as a party to this cause of action. This case, with respect to the plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants, is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Done this 2nd day of April, 2010.
/s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?