Spencer v. Riley et al (INMATE 2)
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that the 33 Recommendation of the Magistrate denying the 29 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is ADOPTED and the Plaintiff's 34 Objections are OVERRULED. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 7/29/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(br, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
JAMES EDWARD SPENCER, #137970
BOB RILEY, et al.,
Case No. 2:09-cv-1089-MEF
(WO-DO NOT PUBLISH)
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 33)
and the Plaintiff’s Objections to that recommendation (Doc. # 34), the Court does not
believe that the Plaintiff has met the criteria for obtaining a preliminary injunction.
Specifically, the Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate (1) a substantial likelihood of success
on the merits; (2) a substantial threat of irreparable injury; (3) that the threatened injury
outweighs the potential damage to the non-moving party; and (4) that the injunction
would not be adverse to the public interest. See Palmer v. Braun, 287 F.3d 1325, 1329
(11th Cir. 2002).
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate
is ADOPTED (Doc. # 33) and the Plaintiff’s Objections are OVERRULED (Doc. # 34).
Done this the 29 day of July, 2011.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?