Miles v. Boyd et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
15
FINAL JUDGMENT entered in favor of respondents and against petitioner and that petitioner take nothing by his said suit; further Considering and Ordering that all costs herein incurred be and the same are hereby taxed against petitioner, for which let execution issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 8/24/10. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
Miles v. Boyd et al (INMATE 2)
Doc. 15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION
D O N MILES, SR., #237 629 P e titio n e r, v. L O U IS BOYD, WARDEN, et al., R e sp o n d e n ts .
) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:09-cv-1095-ID ) (W O ) ) ) ) )
F I N A L JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings and orders of the Court, it is CONSIDERED, O R D E R E D , and ADJUDGED that judgment be and the same is hereby entered in favor of R e sp o n d e n ts , and against Petitioner Don Miles, Sr., and that Petitioner take nothing by his s a id suit. It is further CONSIDERED and ORDERED that all costs herein incurred be and the s a m e are hereby TAXED against Petitioner, for which let execution issue. The clerk of the court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final ju d g m e n t pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. D O N E this the 24th day of August, 2010. /s / Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?