Hunter et al v. Santa Fe Protective Services, Inc.

Filing 100

JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) the defendant's 47 motion for summary judgment is granted; (2) the 72 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgmen t by plaintiffs is denied; (3) judgment is entered in favor of defendant Santa Fe Protective Services, Inc. and against the plaintiffs, with the plaintiffs taking nothing by their complaint; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against the plaintiff s, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/25/11. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist). Furnished to calendar group & AG (terminates Jury Trial 12/05/2011).(djy, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

JEWEL HUNTER, et al.,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiffs,
v.
SANTA FE PROTECTIVE
SERVICES, INC.,
Defendant.

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:09cv1155-MHT
(WO)

JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum entered this date,
it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as
follows:
(1)

The

motion

for

summary

judgment

filed

by

defendant Santa Fe Protective Services, Inc. (Doc. No.
47) is granted.
(2) The partial motion for summary judgment filed by
plaintiffs Jewel Hunter, Carol Adams, Judith Dashner,
Karen Didorek, Marilyn Revalee, Eddie Bradshaw, Linda
Forbes, William Tharpe, John Thompson, William Dover,
Cynthia O’Bryant, Melanie Griffith, John H. Crawford,

Jr., Gregory Davis, Amy J. Hanbury, and Estelle Imfinger,
as administratrix of Huie Infinger’s estate (Doc. No. 72)
is denied.
(3) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Santa
Fe Protective Services, Inc. and against the plaintiffs,
with the plaintiffs taking nothing by their complaint.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
the plaintiffs, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 25th day of October, 2011.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE