North v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1)

Filing 7

ORDER AND OPINION adopting the 6 Recommendation of the Magistrate; dismissing the claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections with prejudice; dismissing said defendant from this cause of action; referring this case, with respect to the allegations set forth against defendant Ware, back to the Magistrate for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/10/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(br, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION TILLMAN NORTH, AIS # 252941, Plaintiff, v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv89-WHA ORDER AND OPINION On February 18, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 6). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. The plaintiff's claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(I). 2. The Alabama Department of Corrections is DISMISSED as a defendant in this cause of action. 3. This case, with respect to the allegations set forth against defendant Ware, are referred back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Done this the 10th day of March, 2010. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?