Washington v. United States of America (INMATE3)

Filing 22

JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) petitioner's 20 objections are overruled; (2) the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge is ADOPTED; (3) petitioner' ;s 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) is denied as time-barred; further ORDERING that the 6 motion to dismiss and 13 motion for writ of mandamus are DENIED; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which e xecution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/27/11. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION MARNAIL WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv279-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Petitioner’s objections (doc. no. 20) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge’s recommendation (doc. no. 14) is adopted. (3) Petitioner’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct, etc., (doc. no. 1) is denied as time-barred. It is further ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (doc. no. 6) and motion for writ of mandamus (doc. no. 13) are denied. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 27th day of December, 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?