Whitley v. Albright et al (INMATE 2)
ORDER, JUDGMENT AND DECREE of the court that: (1) the plf's 26 objection the recommendation is overruled; (2) the 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge is adopted; (3) the plf's July 20 & 22, 2010 pleadings, considered to be motinos for a preliminary injunction 23 & 24 are DENIED; (4) this case is referred back to the Mag Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 9/21/10. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
W h i t l e y v. Albright et al (INMATE 2)
D o c . 38
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF N O R T H E R N DIVISION G A L E ACREMAN WHITLEY, P l a i n t if f , v. W A R D E N FRANK ALBRIGHT, et al., D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C A S E NO. 2:10-cv-0315-TMH WO
A f te r an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE o f the court that: 1 . The plaintiff's objection (Doc. #26) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate J u d g e filed on July 29, 2010 is overruled; 2 . The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #25) filed on July 23, 2010 is adopted; 3 . The plaintiff's July 20 & 22, 2010 pleadings, considered to be motions for a p re lim in a ry injunction (Doc. #23 & #24) are DENIED. 4 . This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. D O N E this the 21st day of September, 2010. /s / Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS S E N IO R UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?