Barnett v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Filing 17

JUDGMENT, in accordance with the 16 opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:(1)The United States Magistrate Judge's 15 recommendation is adopted; (2)The 28 U.S.C. 2255 petition for writ of h abeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/29/12. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

LEWIS CARL BARNETT,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:10cv356-MHT
(WO)

JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) The

United

States

Magistrate

Judge's

recommendation (Doc. No. 15) is adopted.
(2) The 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition for writ of habeas
corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
petitioner, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 29th day of August, 2012.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE