Clark v. City of Montgomery

Filing 21

FINAL JUDGMENT entered in favor of the City of Montgomery and against Jesse Clark on his federal claims in Count II of the Amended Complaint; that the court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c), over th e state law claims in Count I of the Amended Complaint, and those claims are remanded to the Circuit Court of Montgomery, Alabama; that the Clerk is DIRECTED to take the necessary steps to effect the remand. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/2/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cc, ) Copy mailed to Circuit Court Clerk along with 20 Memorandum Opinion and Order and copy of docket sheet. Deadlines terminated: 05/05/2011 Pretrial and 06/06/2011 Jury Trial

Download PDF
Clark v. City of Montgomery Doc. 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JESSE CLARK, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:10cv466-WHA (wo) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered in this case, Final Judgment is entered in favor of the City of Montgomery and against Jesse Clark on his federal claims in Count II of the Amended Complaint. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c), over the state law claims in Count I of the Amended Complaint, and those claims are remanded to the Circuit Court of Montgomery, Alabama. The Clerk is DIRECTED to take the necessary steps to effect the remand. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. Done this 2nd day of March, 2011. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?