McCall v. H. Council Trenholm State Technical College et al
Filing
52
JUDGMENT: that plaintiff's 50 objections are overruled; that the United States Magistrate Judge's 49 recommendation is adopted; that the remaining defendants' 43 motion for summary judgment is granted; that Judgment is entered in favor of the remaining defendants and against the plaintiff, with the plaintiff taking nothing by his complaint; that costs are taxed against the plaintiff, for which execution may issue; that the clerk is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; that this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/15/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cc, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
HARRY L. McCALL,
Plaintiff,
v.
H. COUNCIL TRENHOLM STATE
TECHNICAL COLLEGE,
et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:10cv476-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) The plaintiff's objections (Doc. No. 50) are
overruled.
(2) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendation (Doc. No. 49) is adopted.
(3) The remaining defendants’ motion for summary
judgment (Doc. No. 43) is granted.
(4) Judgment is entered in favor of the remaining
defendants and against the plaintiff, with the plaintiff
taking nothing by his complaint.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
the plaintiff, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 15th day of December, 2011.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?