Still v. Boyd et al (INMATE1)
Filing
17
OPINION and ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the 16 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is here by ADOPTED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for the plaintiff's abandonment of his claims, his failure to comply with the orders of this court and his failure to properly prosecute this case. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/10/12. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
HENRY STILL, AIS # 215251,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
LOUIS BOYD, et al.,
Defendants.
CIV. ACT. NO. 2:10cv519-WHA
(WO)
OPINION and ORDER
On March 20, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 16). Upon an independent review of
the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge,
it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be
and is hereby ADOPTED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice
for the plaintiff’s abandonment of his claims, his failure to comply with the orders of this
court and his failure to properly prosecute this case.
Done this the 10th day of April 2012.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?