Beasley et al v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 17

FINAL JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of the Respondents, and against Petitioner Gene Beasley. It is further CONSIDERED and ORDERED that all costs herein incurred be and the same are hereby TAXED against the Petitioner, for which let execution issue. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 10/18/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cb, )

Download PDF
-SRW Beasley et al v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 17 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION G E N E BEASLEY, #161 851, P e titio n e r, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C iv il Action No. 2:10-CV-547-ID (W O ) W IL L IE THOMAS, WARDEN, et al., R e sp o n d e n ts . FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings and orders of the Court, it is CONSIDERED, O R D E R E D , and ADJUDGED that judgment be and the same is hereby entered in favor of th e Respondents, and against Petitioner Gene Beasley. It is further CONSIDERED and ORDERED that all costs herein incurred be and the s a m e are hereby TAXED against the Petitioner, for which let execution issue. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final ju d g m e n t pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. D O N E this the 18th day of October, 2010. /s / Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?