Brasher v. McCraney et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONof the Mag Judge; ORDERING as follows: (1) plf's claims against the Bullock Correctional Facility are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § ; 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); (2) the Bullock County Correction Facility is DISMISSED as a party to this complaint; (3) with respect to the remaining defs, this case is referred back to the Mag Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/25/10. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
Brasher v. McCraney et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION RYAN BRASHER, #183962, Plaintiff, vs. LT. MCCRANEY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv575-WHA ORDER No timely objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #12), entered on August 3, 2010, the court adopts the Recommendation, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's claims against the Bullock Correctional Facility are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 2. The Bullock Correctional Facility is DISMISSED as a party to this Complaint. 3. With respect to the remaining Defendants, this case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE this 25th day August, 2010. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?