Madison v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 18

ORDER directing that: 1) The 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) Plf's claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections be DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3) The Alabama Department of Corrections be DISMISSED as a dft in this cause of action; and, 4) This case with respect to the allegations set forth against the remaining dfts, be referred back to the magistrate judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 9/20/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

M a d i s o n v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)

D o c . 18

THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION J A M E S HAROLD MADISON, AIS #163664 P l a i n t if f , v. A L A . DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al. , D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

2 : 1 0 -C V -6 1 0 -T M H WO )

ORDER
O n July 20, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. 4) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this c a se and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is O R D E R E D that: 1. 2. T h e Recommendation (Doc. 4) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; P la in tif f 's claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections be

D IS M IS S E D with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 2 8 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3. T h e Alabama Department of Corrections be DISMISSED as a defendant in this and,

c a u se of action; 4.

T h is case with respect to the allegations set forth against the remaining

d e f e n d a n t s, be referred back to the magistrate judge for additional proceedings.

Dockets.Justia.com

D o n e this 20th day of September, 2010. /s / Truman M. Hobbs S E N IO R UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2