Madison v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 18

ORDER directing that: 1) The 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) Plf's claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections be DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3) The Alabama Department of Corrections be DISMISSED as a dft in this cause of action; and, 4) This case with respect to the allegations set forth against the remaining dfts, be referred back to the magistrate judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 9/20/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

Download PDF
M a d i s o n v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1) D o c . 18 THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION J A M E S HAROLD MADISON, AIS #163664 P l a i n t if f , v. A L A . DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al. , D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2 : 1 0 -C V -6 1 0 -T M H WO ) ORDER O n July 20, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. 4) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this c a se and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is O R D E R E D that: 1. 2. T h e Recommendation (Doc. 4) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; P la in tif f 's claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections be D IS M IS S E D with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 2 8 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3. T h e Alabama Department of Corrections be DISMISSED as a defendant in this and, c a u se of action; 4. T h is case with respect to the allegations set forth against the remaining d e f e n d a n t s, be referred back to the magistrate judge for additional proceedings. Dockets.Justia.com D o n e this 20th day of September, 2010. /s / Truman M. Hobbs S E N IO R UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?