Jennings-Jones v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
Filing
16
ORDERING as follows: (1) plf Ida Jennings-Jones's 12 objections are overruled; (2) the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge is adopted; (3) the Title VII claims are dismissed as to the individual defendants; the title VII claims remain p ending as to def Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and the EPA claims remain pending as to def Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and the individual defs; (4) this case is referred back to the US Mag Judge for further appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 11/12/10. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
-TFM Jennings-Jones v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al (MAG+)
Doc. 16
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
IDA JENNINGS-JONES, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al., Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv739-MHT
After
an
independent
and
de
novo
review
of
the
record, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) Plaintiff Ida Jennings-Jones's objections (doc. no. 12) are overruled. (2) The magistrate judge's recommendation (doc. no. 7) is adopted. (3) The Title VII claims are dismissed as to the individual defendants. The Title VII claims
remain pending as to defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and the EPA claims remain pending as to
Dockets.Justia.com
defendant
Wal-Mart
Stores,
Inc.
and
the
individual defendants. (4) This case is referred back to the United States Magistrate proceedings. DONE, this the 12th day of November, 2010. Judge for further appropriate
/s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?