Jennings-Jones v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al

Filing 16

ORDERING as follows: (1) plf Ida Jennings-Jones's 12 objections are overruled; (2) the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge is adopted; (3) the Title VII claims are dismissed as to the individual defendants; the title VII claims remain p ending as to def Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and the EPA claims remain pending as to def Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and the individual defs; (4) this case is referred back to the US Mag Judge for further appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 11/12/10. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
-TFM Jennings-Jones v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al (MAG+) Doc. 16 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION IDA JENNINGS-JONES, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv739-MHT After an independent and de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) Plaintiff Ida Jennings-Jones's objections (doc. no. 12) are overruled. (2) The magistrate judge's recommendation (doc. no. 7) is adopted. (3) The Title VII claims are dismissed as to the individual defendants. The Title VII claims remain pending as to defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and the EPA claims remain pending as to Dockets.Justia.com defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and the individual defendants. (4) This case is referred back to the United States Magistrate proceedings. DONE, this the 12th day of November, 2010. Judge for further appropriate /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?