Lee v. Williams et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 5

FINAL JUDGMENT directing that it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that judgment be and the same is hereby entered in favor of the Defendants, and against Plaintiff Gregory Lee and that the Plaintiff take nothing by his said suit; further CONSIDER ED and ORDERED that all costs herein incurred be and the same are hereby TAXED against the Plaintiff, for which let execution issue; the Clerk of Court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 9/30/10. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
-WC Lee v. Williams et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 5 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION GREGORY LEE, #184 070 Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:10-CV-754-ID (WO) SGT. WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings and orders of the Court, it is C O N S ID E R E D , ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that judgment be and the same is hereby e n te re d in favor of the Defendants, and against Plaintiff Gregory Lee and that the Plaintiff ta k e nothing by his said suit. It is further CONSIDERED and ORDERED that all costs herein incurred be and th e same are hereby TAXED against the Plaintiff, for which let execution issue. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final ju d g m e n t pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. D O N E this the 30th day of September, 2010. /s / Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?