Caldwell v. Riley et al (INMATE 2)(CONSENT)
FINAL JUDGMENT: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 1) Plf's 1 Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and Requests for Declaratory and Permanent Injunctive Relief are DENIED as moot; 2) Plf's challenges to the Alabama Community Notification Act are DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; 3) Dfts' 23 Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to Plf's remaining § 1983 claims is GRANTED; 4) Plf's state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice; 5) Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Dfts and against Plf; 6) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 7) No costs are taxed; DIRECTING the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58, FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 2/27/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
PAUL D. CALDWELL, #261 005
GOV. BOB RILEY, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:10-CV-784-WC
In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions and orders of the court, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:
Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and requests for declaratory and
permanent injunctive relief (Doc. No. 1) are DENIED as moot;
Plaintiff’s challenges to the Alabama Community Notification Act are
DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction;
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment with respect to Plaintiff’s remaining
§ 1983 claims (Doc. No. 23) is GRANTED;
Plaintiff’s state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice;
Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff;
This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; and
No costs are taxed.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final
judgment pursuant to Rule 58, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Done this 27th day of February, 2013.
/s/ Wallace Capel, Jr.
WALLACE CAPEL, JR.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?