Chappell v. Chase Bank/Home Finance LLC et al (MAG+)

Filing 78

ORDER adopting 69 Report and Recommendations; that plaintiff's 50 motion to dismiss defendants Compass Bank and Regions Bank as parties to this action is granted; that defendant Compass Bank's 57 motion to dismiss and defendant Region s Bank's 62 motion to dismiss are granted; that defendants Compass Bank and Regions Bank are dismissed with prejudice and are terminated as parties to this action; that this matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings in this action. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/27/2012. (cc, ). Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/27/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cc, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) MICHAEL T. CHAPPELL, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.2:10-cv-1026-MHT ) [wo] CHASE BANK/HOME FINANCE ) LLC., et al. ) ) Respondent. ) ) ORDER On May 25, 2012, the magistrate judge issued a recommendation to which no timely objections were made. Upon an independent and de novo review of the record and upon consideration of the recommendation of the magistrate judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE that: (1) The recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 69) is adopted. (2) The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendants Compass Bank and Regions Bank as parties to this action (Doc. 50 p. 3) is granted. (3) Defendant Compass Bank’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 57) and defendant Regions Bank’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 62) are granted. (4) Defendants Compass Bank and Regions Bank are dismissed with prejudice and are terminated as parties to this action. It is further ORDERED that this matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings in this action. DONE this 27th day of June, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?