Tuck v. Hetzel et al (INMATE1)

Filing 6

FINAL JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice and that costs be and are hereby TAXED against the petitioner; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 3/21/11. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

-CSC Tuck v. Hetzel et al (INMATE1)

Doc. 6

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

TONEY DEANGELO TUCK, #186423, Petitioner, v. GARY HETZEL, et al., Respondents.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv106-ID (WO)

FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice and that costs be and are hereby TAXED against the petitioner. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Done this the 21 st day of March, 2011.

/s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com