Woods v. Bullock County Jail, et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 48

ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) 47 The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) Defendant Dr. Tahir Siddiq's 12 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; (3 ) This action is DISMISSED as to Defendant Siddiq with prejudice; (4) Defendants Rodgers's and Pritchett's 25 motion to dismiss is GRANTED due to Plaintiff's failure to exhaust available administrative remedies available during Plain tiff's confinement at Bullock County Jail; (5) This action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendants Rodgers and Pritchett; and (6) All costs incurred are TAXED against Plaintiff. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/6/12. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
TIMOTHY WOODS,
Plaintiff,
v.
SHERIFF RAYMOND RODGERS,
et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:11-CV-240-WKW

ORDER
There being no objections filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
(Doc. # 47), and upon an independent review of the file in this case, it is ORDERED
as follows:
(1)

The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED;

(2)

Defendant Dr. Tahir Siddiq’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 12)

is GRANTED;
(3)

This action is DISMISSED as to Defendant Siddiq with prejudice;

(4)

Defendants Rodgers’s and Pritchett’s motion to dismiss (Doc. # 25) is

GRANTED due to Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust available administrative remedies
available during Plaintiff’s confinement at Bullock County Jail (see 42 U.S.C. §
1997e(a));

(5)

This action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendants Rodgers and

Pritchett; and
(6)

All costs incurred are TAXED against Plaintiff.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.
DONE this 6th day of March, 2012.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2