Owens v. JP Morgan Chase et al
Filing
18
JUDGMENT, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that the 17 motion to dismiss is granted and that def JP Morgan Chase and the claims against it are dismissed with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs, attorneys' fees , and expenses, as further set out in order; the case still remains pending as to other defendants; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 5/19/11. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
SIDNEY OWENS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
JP MORGAN CHASE, a foreign )
corporation, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:11cv265-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court
that the motion to dismiss (doc. no. 17) is granted and
that defendant JP Morgan Chase and the claims against it
are dismissed with prejudice, with the parties to bear
their own costs, attorneys’ fees, and expenses.
The
court assumes that defendant JP Morgan Chase has no
objection to the allowance of the dismissal; however, if
it does, it must file the objection within seven days
from the date of this order.
This
case
still
remains
pending
as
to
other
defendants.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
DONE, this the 19th day of May, 2011.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?